Issue When trying to connect GlobalProtect to the Palo Alto Networks firewall, it is successfully connecting to the portal, but gives a certificate error when it tries to connect to the gateway. If it resolves to an internal IP address, this will make the portal inaccessible from the external interface. GlobalProtect Gateway Certificate Error When Trying to connect GlobalProtectīefore making this change, make sure the DNS servers that are used on the firewall are able to resolve the "GlobalProtect Portal" hostname to a public IP address and that there is also a PTR record to resolve the IP address back to the hostname. If the gateway certificate includes a hostname dnsname in the Subject Alternative Name SAN attribute, it should also match the Common Name of the certificate as indicated in the article above. The validation check makes sure that the gateway address configured in the GlobalProtect portal matches the CN of the certificate that the gateway is configured to use. When the client connects to the Gateway using tunnel mode, a virtual adapter is created and networking configuration will be assigned to the client.When trying to connect GlobalProtect to the Palo Alto Networks firewall, it is successfully connecting to the portal, but gives a certificate error when it tries to connect to the gateway. If tunnel mode is disable, this section will be grayed out. The IPSec tunnel from the remote users is terminated on this tunnel interface. A tunnel interface is required when configuring external gateway. I n this example we will configure an external gateway. For this example we will refer to the topology below. The gateway can be either external or internal. Once the client is connected it sends all traffic through the gateway. Next thing you would like to do is to setup authentication profile, it refers to the authentication method configured in previous step. User Authentication - Identify the authentication method that will be using to authenticate GlobalProtect users.
![globalprotect the server certificate is invalid globalprotect the server certificate is invalid](https://meganathanr.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/sbc_sertificate_error.jpg)
This is to allow client to determinate if a different version is available.Ĭreate a CA cert and a Gateway cert from digicert or verisign or whatever public certificate your company owns. As it is a client installed on to the users computer. That means every package demanded by the client will be reviewed by the firewall. Users network traffic is gated through the Palo Alto and then out on internet. With GP, users are protected against threats even when they are not on the enterprise network. GlobalProtect provides security for computers that are used in the field by allowing easy and secure login from anywere in the world.
#Globalprotect the server certificate is invalid update#
The update however messed up things in committing stage and generated errors.
![globalprotect the server certificate is invalid globalprotect the server certificate is invalid](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TFstISND5PE/sddefault.jpg)
Discussions General Topics.However there were some pleasant features in 4. Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type. These simple actions take just seconds of your time, but go a long way in showing appreciation for community members and the Live Community as a whole! Turn on suggestions. The member who gave the solution and all future visitors to this topic will appreciate it! Sounds silly, but you were testing the connection on a internet access without any sort of captive portal, right? So when the gp client showed this error, was it showing exactly the cert that you configured? Click Accept as Solution to acknowledge that the answer to your question has been provided. For now I'm just using a self-signed certificate. I think this is a bug in the GlobalProtect client. Clearly, my internal-CA-signed certificate is configured to be allowed for a more limited set of uses and capabilities that the self-signed certificate generated by the PAN NGFW itself. My assumption is that it has something to do with the marked capabilities of the internal-CA-signed certificate vs. When I visit the GP Portal web page, the web browser shows the Portal's server certificate as trusted I do not see any sort of certificate warning which I do when I use the self-signed certificate instead. Regarding the internal CA-signed certificate I used a certificate template that we use for web servers. Globalprotect gateway certificate is invalid